Respectful Clarification: No Malice Intended

Corrigendum

This is in reference to a 17-page legal notice (received today, Sept 1, 2025, Monday, around 5.45 pm) served on Orangenews9 concerning alleged financial irregularities in the Hyderabad Cricket Association (HCA), particularly with reference to the article “Who Ruined Hyderabad Cricket – Part XIII,” which mentioned former Test cricketer and ex-President of HCA, Mr. Arshad Ayub.

At the outset, I wish to state that I have no personal animosity towards Mr. Ayub or any other individual whose name may have appeared in my writings. My sole objective has been to highlight issues that have impacted the functioning of the HCA, with the intent of restoring the credibility and glory of Hyderabad cricket.

The material referred to in my article was based on news reports already published in reputed newspapers and is part of the public domain, including references to case numbers and related proceedings. Wherever required, I have used the term “alleged,” which is standard professional practice in journalism.

It is true that Mr. Ayub has expressed grievance over certain references, including those relating to his real estate venture. If, as claimed by him, he has been exonerated from all court cases in this regard, then any unintended inaccuracy in my reporting is regretted. To that extent alone, I tender an unconditional apology for any incorrect factual reference that may have caused him hurt.

However, I strongly reiterate that neither I, nor Orangenews9, have acted with malice or ill-intent. The campaign series is not directed at any individual but is part of a larger mission to bring transparency to the affairs of the HCA.

Regarding the use of the term “yellow journalism” in the legal notice, I respectfully submit that such characterisation is both unwarranted and damaging to the personal integrity and professional standing of a journalist. A legitimate rejoinder or clarification has always been the proper recourse if any party believes reporting to be inaccurate. Resorting instead to criminal defamation proceedings, in my view, is contrary to the principles of free expression and public accountability.

In conclusion, I reiterate my respect for the law, for the profession of journalism, and for every individual mentioned in my writings. My campaign against irregularities in the HCA will continue, guided only by facts available in the public domain and my commitment to professional integrity.

  • MS Shanker, EDITOR