Chief Minister Revanth Reddy, while criticizing KCR and his family, questioned why they accused him of promoting family rule. He argued that his brothers assist him purely out of a service motive without holding official posts. However, he alleged that KCR and his family are hindering the development of his constituency, raising doubts about whether the government is being run by the BRS or the INC.
Reddy pointed out that despite holding several key portfolios and having a majority mandate, KCR’s indirect actions suggest an inability to govern effectively, even with the full support of his cabinet. He urged KCR to reflect on his performance as a leader and questioned why, with all the power at his disposal, progress remains stalled.
Revanth Reddy’s allegations against KCR’s family have drawn sharp rebuttals. Critics argue that KCR, his son KTR, and his nephew Harish Rao, are all duly elected representatives who have consistently won by large margins, indicating strong public support. While they may have initially benefited from KCR’s prominence, their subsequent electoral victories reflect their political strengths. The voters, it seems, have chosen them for their capabilities, independent of their family ties.
In contrast, Revanth’s brothers, who assist him without holding official positions, have sparked controversy. Critics suggest that if they wish to serve the public, they should enter politics formally, contest elections, and earn positions through merit. This would eliminate any perception of being “extra-constitutional authorities” and counter allegations of undue influence. Supporting family members is not inherently wrong, but public service through legitimate channels garners greater respect and avoids criticism.
The public’s tolerance for KCR’s family involvement stems from their visible contributions, hard work, and ability to deliver results. As long as they continue to gain the confidence of voters, their political roles remain justified. Revanth, however, faces backlash as his comments appear to lack substance and are increasingly counterproductive. His criticism of KCR and his family has often backfired, exposing vulnerabilities in his own leadership and leaving him at odds with his advisors, ministers, and MLAs.
To counter these criticisms, Revanth must address the questions surrounding his brothers’ unofficial roles. If he is confident in their capabilities, he should encourage them to enter politics directly, contest elections, and prove their worth. Leadership demands clarity and decisiveness, and Revanth cannot afford to send mixed signals. Ultimately, one cannot expect to enjoy the benefits of family support while avoiding the scrutiny that comes with it.
