Our Political Desk
Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) Chief Mohan Bhagwat’s recent remarks on increasing fertility among Hindus have ignited a political storm. His suggestion that Hindus should adopt a three-child policy, moving away from India’s long-standing two-child norm, has drawn sharp reactions from opposition parties, particularly the Congress and All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM). This controversy raises deeper questions about demographic trends, political narratives, and the implications for India’s socio-economic future.
Opposition parties have expressed outrage, but their reactions seem layered. On one hand, they frequently dismiss the RSS and BJP as self-proclaimed custodians of Hindu interests. On the other, they react strongly to statements from RSS leaders, suggesting an underlying concern about the political resonance of such calls. Is the opposition fearful that a demographic shift, even marginal, could consolidate Hindu support for the BJP?
Demographic trends have long been a contentious issue in Indian politics. Past reports, including one from the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO), highlighted declining fertility rates among Hindus and rising numbers among Muslims. This data, while factual, often gets weaponized in political rhetoric. The opposition’s reaction to Bhagwat’s comments likely stems from concerns that such rhetoric could stoke communal tensions and polarize voters along religious lines.
India’s population control efforts, notably the “Hum Do, Hamare Do” slogan, were introduced to curb population growth. Sanjay Gandhi’s infamous forced sterilization campaign in the 1970s, though aimed primarily at Muslims, was widely criticized for its coercive methods. However, the principle of family planning was broadly accepted across communities.
Today, India is the world’s second-most populous country, with a population nearing 1.4 billion. While population control remains crucial for sustainable development, some states, such as Telangana and Andhra Pradesh, are reportedly reconsidering the two-child policy. This shift could have significant consequences, especially if the central government follows suit.
India’s demographic trends have implications beyond politics. Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government has ambitious goals to make India the world’s third-largest economy by 2028. Population growth, if not managed, could strain resources and hinder these economic aspirations. Conversely, a young and growing population could be an asset if harnessed effectively through education, healthcare, and job creation.
Bhagwat’s call for increased Hindu fertility must be viewed within this broader context. While concerns about demographic balance are valid, the solution lies in equitable policies that promote family planning across all communities, rather than in polarizing rhetoric.
The lack of immediate response from senior BJP leaders like JP Nadda or Amit Shah suggests a cautious approach. The BJP may not want to alienate moderate voters or invite criticism from international observers. However, the silence also leaves room for speculation about whether the government might align with the RSS’s stance in the future.
Ultimately, the debate over fertility rates is not just about numbers—it is about India’s vision for its future. Balancing population growth with economic goals, social harmony, and resource sustainability will require nuanced policies and responsible leadership. As the political discourse unfolds, the focus should remain on inclusive development rather than divisive narratives.
