As promised, this e-paper opens its columns to all stakeholders of the Hyderabad Cricket Association (HCA) — players, parents, administrators, and even critics — to air their views fairly and freely, but supported by facts and documentary evidence. In that spirit, we present the account of one aggrieved parent whose talented son was allegedly denied a fair chance to represent A division, resulting in a diminished chance for the state team last year, despite consistent performances. What makes his case even more troubling is that the police haven’t come forward to register his complaint, despite supporting documents, while FIRs on similar grievances by other parents were promptly entertained without proper documentary proof. This series opens a fair platform for all Hyderabad Cricket Association stakeholders to share documented concerns and constructive ideas for reform. — Editor
Once a nursery of Indian cricketing greats — from Mohammad Azharuddin to VVS Laxman — the HCA today stands as a symbol of how power, politics, and personal interest can corrode a sporting institution. Allegations of corruption, nepotism, and a “pay-to-play” culture now dominate discussions that were once about batting averages and bowling figures.
For many parents and young players, Hyderabad cricket has become a cruel lottery where talent alone no longer guarantees opportunity. Those who refuse to play by the “unspoken rules” claim they face quiet exclusion, while the compliant are rewarded.
One such parent, whose identity is being withheld at his request, says this:
“Talk of corruption and ‘pay-to-play’ in the Hyderabad Cricket Association (HCA) has been widespread. While some issues deserve scrutiny, not every allegation can be accepted at face value without verification.”
Player Selection Facts
Player A (U19): The complaint stated omission from the probables list.
The records show otherwise. He participated in HCA league matches and probables.
- 2023: League & Probables – 4 wickets total
- 2024: League & Probables – 3 wickets total
- 2025: 11 wickets in B Division (Rank 64) and 5 wickets in Probables (Rank 22).
Player B (U23): Represented leagues and probables, but not as a wicketkeeper — contrary to certain public claims.
According to reliable sources, HCA selectors have issued a legal notice regarding certain allegations circulating online, highlighting the potential legal consequences of making unverified statements.
FIR vs Verified Complaints
In one instance, a loosely worded complaint concerning Player A was reportedly converted into an FIR, even though it was based primarily on another parent’s oral statement and lacked supporting documentation.
Meanwhile, a separate, detailed, and documented complaint — sent on 15 October 2025 via email and registered post to the SHO, Commissioner of Police (Rachakonda), and other officials — has allegedly received no formal response.
This inconsistency raises legitimate questions about selective police action and underscores the need for due diligence and verification before registering FIRs.
Constructive Criticism vs Baseless Allegations
It is both fair and necessary to question HCA’s selection policies and seek greater accountability from its selectors. But linking every decision to corruption without solid evidence risks damaging reputations and undermining faith in the system.
Former cricketers and selectors who have served the game for decades deserve respect, even as transparency and reform are demanded. Constructive criticism must not degenerate into vilification.
Team performance and player selection should be assessed through data and results. Selectors must value performance metrics while exercising professional judgment where needed. A balance between accountability and trust can help improve both outcomes and the public perception of Hyderabad cricket.
Ultimately, facts, fairness, and constructive reform — not frustration, rumour, or legal disputes — must drive the conversation forward.
(This article is based on representations, documents, and testimonies provided by individuals directly involved. The publication has verified available records to the extent possible. All persons and entities mentioned are presumed innocent unless proven otherwise in a court of law. This column intends to promote transparency and accountability in Hyderabad cricket, not to malign any individual or institution.)
