Santana Dharma preaches equality and there is no place for a caste system by birth or inheritance, clearly stated
Bhagwat Geeta in 13th sloka of 4th chapter.
Manustri was not religious scripture, it’s just an individual opinion on administration, which was misinterpreted and misused.
Santana Dharma, commonly known as Hinduism, advocates for a society liberated from the limitations imposed by caste distinctions, asserting that caste is not an intrinsic characteristic linked to one’s birth. This belief is founded on the idea that an individual’s actions, character, and decisions shape their identity, rather than the family caste of their birth. This principle is clearly expressed in Chapter 4, Verse 13 of the Bhagavad Gita, which states that societal divisions are determined by qualities and actions (guna and karma) rather than by family and birth lineage.
Lord Sri Krishna was born into the Yadu royal family and, by nature, embraced the role of a cowherd caretaker. However, when the circumstances required it, he transformed into a warrior, engaging in battle against demons such as Kamsa and Narakasura. He served as an ambassador for the Pandavas, acted as Arjuna’s charioteer, and emerged as a universal teacher through the teachings of the Bhagavad Gita. He exemplified the various roles associated with the divisions of labor, including Shudra, Kshatriya, and Brahmin. Additionally, Lord Krishna’s sister married Arjuna, highlighting the acceptance of inter-caste marriages. This illustrates the fundamental message that individuals can assume any role based on their preferences and inherent qualities.
The narrative of Lord Shiva, often portrayed as a wanderer in cremation grounds, serves as a compelling representation of this principle. Known as Layakaradu, he transcends societal conventions and embodies the notion that divinity is not restricted by caste or social status. His connection to the cremation grounds symbolizes a profound relationship with the cycle of life and death, reinforcing the idea that spiritual advancement is available to everyone, irrespective of their social position.
In a similar vein, the tale of King Satyaharichandram, who assumed the role of a caretaker in a cremation ground, exemplifies the rejection of caste hierarchies. His actions reflect a deep sense of duty and service, illustrating that nobility and honor stem from one’s deeds rather than their lineage.
The character of Dronacharya, a Brahmin teacher who fought bravely on the battlefield of Kurukshetra, further exemplifies this principle. Despite his Brahmin background, his courage and dedication to his role as a warrior emphasize that an individual’s place in society is defined by their choices and actions, not solely by their caste identity.
The Rishi Vedavyas, born to a fisherwoman, is well-known for his pivotal role in the survival of the Kuru dynasty and the author of the Mahabharata epic. These examples collectively demonstrate that greatness and leadership can emerge from any background, effectively challenging the rigid caste system.
